Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSSX vs RWMFX
MCSSX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCSSX vs RWMFX
MCSSX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSSX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSSX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. MCSSX (353M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: RWMFX (1.44) vs MCSSX (0.06). MCSSX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: MCSSX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). MCSSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MCSSX (15.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: RWMFX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. MCSSX (-3.28). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. MCSSX (14.41).
| MCSSX | RWMFX | MCSSX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.837 | 3.858 | 151% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.44 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.28 | 5.76 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.13 | 29.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.41 | 28.02 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.50 | 77.65 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement