Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSSX vs RWMFX
MCSSX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCSSX vs RWMFX
MCSSX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSSX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSSX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MCSSX (345M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: RWMFX (1.40) vs MCSSX (0.07). MCSSX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: MCSSX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). MCSSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MCSSX (15.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: RWMFX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. MCSSX (-4.60). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. MCSSX (12.42).
| MCSSX | RWMFX | MCSSX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.845 | 1.616 | 114% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 345M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.40 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.60 | 8.15 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.71 | 30.58 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.42 | 27.55 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.98 | 82.86 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement