RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MCTDX (63.4M). MCTDX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCTDX (13.48) vs RLBFX (2.03). MCTDX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCTDX (5 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MCTDX (3.91) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). MCTDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 694.99 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCTDX: RLBFX (250) vs MCTDX (10000). RLBFX (8.91) and MCTDX (8.91) have marching annual gain over last year. MCTDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.24 vs. RLBFX (33.87).

	MCTDX	RLBFX	MCTDX / RLBFX
Total Expense Ratio	3.91	0.30	1,303%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	3.91	0.30	1,303%
Fund Existence	5 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	7.721	9.268	83%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	10000	250	4,000%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	63.4M	285B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	13.48	2.03	663%
Returns for 1 year	8.91	8.91	100%
Returns for 3 years	28.38	43.54	65%
Returns for 5 years	60.24	33.87	178%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	88.42	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
GSVCX	16.73	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
UMBMX	27.32	N/A	N/A
Carillon Scout Mid Cap I
GOFIX	28.12	N/A	N/A
GMO Resources III
SGAPX	20.46	N/A	N/A
Virtus SGA Global Growth I
FBAVX	35.47	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor® Balanced Z