MCVT
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.04 (-2.12%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.92M
RM
Price
$32.90
Change
-$0.20 (-0.60%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
236.25M
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCVT vs RM

Header iconMCVT vs RM Comparison
Open Charts MCVT vs RMBanner chart's image
Mill City Ventures III
Price$1.85
Change-$0.04 (-2.12%)
Volume$400
Capitalization16.92M
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$32.90
Change-$0.20 (-0.60%)
Volume$736
Capitalization236.25M
MCVT vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCVT vs. RM commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVT is a Hold and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MCVT: $1.84 vs. RM: $32.95)
Brand notoriety: MCVT and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCVT: 221% vs. RM: 135%
Market capitalization -- MCVT: $16.92M vs. RM: $236.25M
MCVT [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $16.92M. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCVT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCVT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the long-term than MCVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCVT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCVT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than MCVT.

Price Growth

MCVT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +6.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCVT is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.76% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RM($236M) has a higher market cap than MCVT($16.9M). MCVT has higher P/E ratio than RM: MCVT (20.83) vs RM (14.49). RM YTD gains are higher at: -1.170 vs. MCVT (-3.186). RM has more cash in the bank: 7.41M vs. MCVT (604K). MCVT has less debt than RM: MCVT (14.7K) vs RM (1.43B). RM has higher revenues than MCVT: RM (484M) vs MCVT (2.51M).
MCVTRMMCVT / RM
Capitalization16.9M236M7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.186-1.170272%
P/E Ratio20.8314.49144%
Revenue2.51M484M1%
Total Cash604K7.41M8%
Total Debt14.7K1.43B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCVT vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
MCVT
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8429
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9365
SMR RATING
1..100
7813
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (39) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (93) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCVT (78) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (55) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

RM's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (100) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCVTRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKSC14.550.21
+1.46%
Bank of South Carolina Corp.
PCRFF10.150.01
+0.10%
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
CASXF0.05N/A
N/A
Casa Minerals Inc.
CSPHF0.52N/A
N/A
CSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS
NPEHF17.18N/A
N/A
NIPPON EXPRESS HLDGS INC.

MCVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCVT and AER have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCVT and AER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCVT
1D Price
Change %
MCVT100%
+3.85%
AER - MCVT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
WRLD - MCVT
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
AL - MCVT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
NAVI - MCVT
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
DFS - MCVT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More