MCW
Price
$5.67
Change
-$0.08 (-1.39%)
Updated
Aug 28, 11:33 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.89B
70 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$58.31
Change
-$0.89 (-1.50%)
Updated
Aug 28, 11:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.58B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCW vs RUSHB

Header iconMCW vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts MCW vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
Mister Car Wash
Price$5.67
Change-$0.08 (-1.39%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.89B
Rush Enterprises
Price$58.31
Change-$0.89 (-1.50%)
Volume$170
Capitalization4.58B
MCW vs RUSHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCW vs. RUSHB commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCW is a StrongBuy and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MCW: $5.76 vs. RUSHB: $59.20)
Brand notoriety: MCW and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCW: 74% vs. RUSHB: 55%
Market capitalization -- MCW: $1.89B vs. RUSHB: $4.58B
MCW [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $1.89B. RUSHB’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $51.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the long-term than MCW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCW is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHB.

Price Growth

MCW (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +6.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+3.80% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHB($4.58B) has a higher market cap than MCW($1.89B). MCW has higher P/E ratio than RUSHB: MCW (22.15) vs RUSHB (16.87). RUSHB YTD gains are higher at: 9.835 vs. MCW (-20.988). RUSHB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 682M vs. MCW (273M). RUSHB has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. MCW (26.4M). RUSHB (1.75B) and MCW (1.79B) have identical debt. RUSHB has higher revenues than MCW: RUSHB (7.69B) vs MCW (1.03B).
MCWRUSHBMCW / RUSHB
Capitalization1.89B4.58B41%
EBITDA273M682M40%
Gain YTD-20.9889.835-213%
P/E Ratio22.1516.87131%
Revenue1.03B7.69B13%
Total Cash26.4M211M13%
Total Debt1.79B1.75B102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCWRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAIX17.23N/A
N/A
Chase Growth Institutional
TORCX18.24N/A
N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR C
VRGWX884.94N/A
N/A
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index I
EICIX19.31N/A
N/A
EIC Value Institutional
PIBAX18.83N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced A

MCW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with DRVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then DRVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCW
1D Price
Change %
MCW100%
+0.52%
DRVN - MCW
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
RUSHA - MCW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
PAG - MCW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
AN - MCW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
RUSHB - MCW
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
+1.63%
RUSHA - RUSHB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
GPI - RUSHB
68%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
AN - RUSHB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
ABG - RUSHB
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
PAG - RUSHB
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More