Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFOX vs RGACX
MDFOX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MDFOX vs RGACX
MDFOX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFOX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFOX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MDFOX (1.73B). MDFOX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MDFOX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MDFOX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MDFOX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFOX: RGACX (250) vs MDFOX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. MDFOX (-17.52). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. MDFOX (-7.68).
| MDFOX | RGACX | MDFOX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.93 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.93 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.311 | 8.819 | -94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.52 | -0.53 | 3,300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.04 | 40.68 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.68 | 10.82 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.38 | 101.31 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement