Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFOX vs RGACX
MDFOX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MDFOX vs RGACX
MDFOX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFOX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFOX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MDFOX (1.77B). MDFOX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MDFOX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MDFOX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MDFOX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX (32.00) and MDFOX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFOX: RGACX (250) vs MDFOX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. MDFOX (0.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.76 vs. MDFOX (12.03).
| MDFOX | RGACX | MDFOX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.93 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.93 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.128 | 6.443 | 142% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 7.86 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.53 | 42.49 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.03 | 15.76 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.21 | 103.85 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement