Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFOX vs RGAGX
MDFOX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MDFOX vs RGAGX
MDFOX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFOX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFOX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MDFOX (1.77B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MDFOX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MDFOX (0.00). MDFOX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MDFOX (26 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MDFOX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX (32.00) and MDFOX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFOX: RGAGX (250) vs MDFOX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. MDFOX (0.38). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.11 vs. MDFOX (12.03).
| MDFOX | RGAGX | MDFOX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.29 | 338% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.128 | 6.752 | 135% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 8.97 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.53 | 46.48 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.03 | 20.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.21 | 112.90 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers