MDMXF
Price
$17.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
SPXSF
Price
$97.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

MDMXF vs SPXSF

Header iconMDMXF vs SPXSF Comparison
Open Charts MDMXF vs SPXSFBanner chart's image
MEDMIX AG
Price$17.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
SPIRAX GROUP
Price$97.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MDMXF vs SPXSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
MDMXF vs. SPXSF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDMXF is a Hold and SPXSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MDMXF: $17.40 vs. SPXSF: $90.75)
Brand notoriety: MDMXF and SPXSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDMXF: 100% vs. SPXSF: 0%
Market capitalization -- MDMXF: $1.14B vs. SPXSF: $10.55B
MDMXF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.14B. SPXSF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $10.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MDMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPXSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPXSF is a better buy in the long-term than MDMXF.

Price Growth

MDMXF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPXSF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -7.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.35% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXSF($10.5B) has a higher market cap than MDMXF($1.14B). MDMXF YTD gains are higher at: -18.118 vs. SPXSF (-30.566). SPXSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 388M vs. MDMXF (67.2M). SPXSF has more cash in the bank: 305M vs. MDMXF (153M). MDMXF has less debt than SPXSF: MDMXF (317M) vs SPXSF (569M). SPXSF has higher revenues than MDMXF: SPXSF (1.45B) vs MDMXF (475M).
MDMXFSPXSFMDMXF / SPXSF
Capitalization1.14B10.5B11%
EBITDA67.2M388M17%
Gain YTD-18.118-30.56659%
P/E RatioN/A33.56-
Revenue475M1.45B33%
Total Cash153M305M50%
Total Debt317M569M56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPXSF: Fundamental Ratings
SPXSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

MDMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDMXF has been loosely correlated with PCT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDMXF jumps, then PCT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDMXF
1D Price
Change %
MDMXF100%
N/A
PCT - MDMXF
37%
Loosely correlated
+5.76%
PCTTU - MDMXF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
SPXSF - MDMXF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUTIF - MDMXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRFS - MDMXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXSF and MDMXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXSF and MDMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXSF
1D Price
Change %
SPXSF100%
N/A
MDMXF - SPXSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDLY - SPXSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXSY - SPXSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
TOMZ - SPXSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
TTNDF - SPXSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More