It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileZBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZBH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MDT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.66% price change this week, while ZBH (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +9.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.05%.
MDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
ZBH is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| MDT | ZBH | MDT / ZBH | |
| Capitalization | 135B | 19.3B | 699% |
| EBITDA | 9.35B | 2.28B | 411% |
| Gain YTD | 34.632 | -6.984 | -496% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.46 | 24.21 | 118% |
| Revenue | 34.2B | 7.83B | 437% |
| Total Cash | 8.12B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 28.6B | 7.57B | 378% |
MDT | ZBH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDT's Valuation (16) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ZBH (21). This means that MDT’s stock grew similarly to ZBH’s over the last 12 months.
MDT's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ZBH (100). This means that MDT’s stock grew similarly to ZBH’s over the last 12 months.
MDT's SMR Rating (68) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ZBH (75). This means that MDT’s stock grew similarly to ZBH’s over the last 12 months.
MDT's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZBH (61). This means that MDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZBH’s over the last 12 months.
ZBH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as MDT (31). This means that ZBH’s stock grew similarly to MDT’s over the last 12 months.
| MDT | ZBH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 11 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LITP | 12.02 | 0.49 | +4.25% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | |||
| FNDX | 27.06 | 0.19 | +0.71% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large CompanyETF | |||
| AUSF | 46.06 | 0.23 | +0.50% |
| Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF | |||
| BSJU | 26.06 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2030 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| TCPB | 51.82 | -0.14 | -0.27% |
| Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDT has been loosely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDT jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.