Ad is loading...
MDVZX vs RMEBX
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$7.66
Change+$0.05 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.55M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. MDVZX (155M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDVZX (2.21) vs RMEBX (1.18). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.49). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. MDVZX (-6.13). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. MDVZX (26.73).
| MDVZX | RMEBX | MDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.07 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.435 | -3.381 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.18 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.13 | 3.48 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.44 | 5.34 | -195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.73 | 47.73 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...