Ad is loading...
MDVZX vs RMEBX
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.25
Change-$0.12 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.22M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.50
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. MDVZX (170M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDVZX (2.19) vs RMEBX (1.15). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.49). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. MDVZX (0.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 75.71 vs. MDVZX (58.08).
| MDVZX | RMEBX | MDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.07 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.826 | 1.093 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.15 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | 5.48 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.90 | 15.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.08 | 75.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...