Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MFSCX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
MFS SC Municipal Bond A
Price$11.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.09M
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MFSCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. MFSCX (218M). MDXBX (3.50) and MFSCX (3.38) have matching dividends . MDXBX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: MDXBX (38 years) vs MFSCX (41 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MFSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MFSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. MFSCX (0.71). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. MFSCX (2.06).
| MDXBX | MFSCX | MDXBX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.061 | 1.622 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 218M | 1,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.38 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 0.71 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.98 | 11.50 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.55 | 2.06 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.99 | 14.76 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement