Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MFSCX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
MFS SC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.42M
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. MFSCX (214M). MDXBX (3.46) and MFSCX (3.31) have matching dividends . MDXBX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: MDXBX (38 years) vs MFSCX (41 years). MFSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MFSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MFSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.67 vs. MFSCX (-2.82). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. MFSCX (-2.87).
| MDXBX | MFSCX | MDXBX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.89 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.809 | -3.564 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 214M | 1,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 3.31 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -2.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.47 | 1.76 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.33 | -2.87 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.30 | 8.90 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers