Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MFSCX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
MFS SC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.19M
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. MFSCX (217M). MDXBX (3.44) and MFSCX (3.29) have matching dividends . MDXBX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: MDXBX (38 years) vs MFSCX (41 years). MFSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MFSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MFSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.22 vs. MFSCX (-0.39). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. MFSCX (-0.15).
| MDXBX | MFSCX | MDXBX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.89 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.677 | -2.102 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 217M | 1,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.29 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.22 | -0.39 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.17 | 5.82 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -0.15 | -1,851% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.02 | 11.01 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement