Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.56B vs. MFSCX (256M). MDXBX (3.49) and MFSCX (3.45) have matching dividends . MDXBX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: MDXBX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.55). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.10 vs. MFSCX (21.00). MFSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MFSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX (7.86) and MFSCX (7.60) have marching annual gain over last year. MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.91 vs. MFSCX (2.59).
| MDXBX | MFSCX | MDXBX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.687 | 2.554 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 256M | 999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.45 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 7.60 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.40 | 11.84 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.91 | 2.59 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.02 | 13.38 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement