Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MFSCX
MDXBX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. MFSCX (252M). MDXBX (3.49) and MFSCX (3.45) have matching dividends . MDXBX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: MDXBX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.55). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.10 vs. MFSCX (19.00). MFSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MFSCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX (8.19) and MFSCX (7.83) have marching annual gain over last year. MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. MFSCX (2.25).
| MDXBX | MFSCX | MDXBX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.184 | 2.004 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 252M | 1,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.45 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.19 | 7.83 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.26 | 11.39 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | 2.25 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.24 | 14.14 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement