Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MECDX vs NPFCX
MECDX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MECDX vs NPFCX
MECDX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MECDX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MECDX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MECDX (137M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than MECDX: NPFCX (0.33) vs MECDX (0.17). MECDX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MECDX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MECDX (1.25). MECDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MECDX: NPFCX (250) vs MECDX (15000). NPFCX (7.23) and MECDX (7.19) have marching annual gain over last year. NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.29 vs. MECDX (5.93).
| MECDX | NPFCX | MECDX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.47 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.511 | 5.694 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.33 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 7.23 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 34.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.93 | 9.29 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.24 | 103.38 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers