Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDEX vs REBAX
MEDEX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDEX vs REBAX
MEDEX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDEX vs. REBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDEX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDEX has more cash in the bank: 7.65B vs. REBAX (366M). REBAX (4.76) and MEDEX (4.56) have matching dividends . MEDEX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDEX (18 years) vs REBAX (20 years). MEDEX (1.33) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.11). MEDEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REBAX (42.00). MEDEX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDEX (0) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX (12.12) and MEDEX (11.88) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDEX (12.14) and REBAX (11.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MEDEX | REBAX | MEDEX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.11 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.11 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.246 | 2.465 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.65B | 366M | 2,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.76 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.88 | 12.12 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.12 | 33.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.14 | 11.78 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.01 | 41.87 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers