Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDEX vs REBAX
MEDEX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDEX vs REBAX
MEDEX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDEX vs. REBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDEX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDEX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. REBAX (356M). MEDEX (5.04) and REBAX (4.84) have matching dividends . MEDEX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDEX (18 years) vs REBAX (21 years). MEDEX (1.33) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.11). MEDEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REBAX (42.00). MEDEX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDEX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDEX (7.27) and REBAX (6.94) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.13 vs. REBAX (10.15).
| MEDEX | REBAX | MEDEX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.11 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.11 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.866 | 1.833 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.58B | 356M | 2,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.04 | 4.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 6.94 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 32.09 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.13 | 10.15 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.90 | 31.33 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement