Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDFX vs REBAX
MEDFX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDFX vs REBAX
MEDFX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDFX vs. REBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDFX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDFX has more cash in the bank: 7.65B vs. REBAX (366M). MEDFX (4.80) and REBAX (4.76) have matching dividends . MEDFX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDFX (18 years) vs REBAX (20 years). REBAX (1.11) and MEDFX (1.08) have similar cost to investors . MEDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REBAX (42.00). MEDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDFX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDFX (12.19) and REBAX (12.12) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.58 vs. REBAX (11.78).
| MEDFX | REBAX | MEDFX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.11 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.11 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.354 | 2.465 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.65B | 366M | 2,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.80 | 4.76 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.19 | 12.12 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.16 | 33.19 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.58 | 11.78 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.78 | 41.87 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers