Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDFX vs REBAX
MEDFX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDFX vs REBAX
MEDFX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDFX vs. REBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDFX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDFX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. REBAX (356M). MEDFX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDFX (5.29) vs REBAX (4.84). MEDFX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDFX (18 years) vs REBAX (21 years). REBAX (1.11) and MEDFX (1.08) have similar cost to investors . MEDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REBAX (42.00). MEDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDFX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. REBAX (6.94). MEDFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.56 vs. REBAX (10.15).
| MEDFX | REBAX | MEDFX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.11 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.11 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.012 | 1.833 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.58B | 356M | 2,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.29 | 4.84 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | 6.94 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.83 | 32.09 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.56 | 10.15 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.32 | 31.33 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers