Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDGX vs REBAX
MEDGX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDGX vs REBAX
MEDGX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDGX vs. REBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDGX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDGX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. REBAX (351M). MEDGX (5.05) and REBAX (4.84) have matching dividends . MEDGX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDGX (18 years) vs REBAX (20 years). REBAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than MEDGX (0.83). MEDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REBAX (42.00). MEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDGX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDGX (7.73) and REBAX (7.39) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.99 vs. REBAX (9.49).
| MEDGX | REBAX | MEDGX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.11 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.11 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.335 | 1.224 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.52B | 351M | 2,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 4.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 7.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.66 | 27.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.99 | 9.49 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.74 | 33.50 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers