Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDGX vs REBAX
MEDGX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDGX vs REBAX
MEDGX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDGX vs. REBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDGX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDGX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. REBAX (357M). MEDGX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDGX (5.58) vs REBAX (4.81). MEDGX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDGX (18 years) vs REBAX (21 years). REBAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than MEDGX (0.83). MEDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REBAX (42.00). MEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDGX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. REBAX (3.95). MEDGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.56 vs. REBAX (8.23).
| MEDGX | REBAX | MEDGX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.11 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.11 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.935 | 1.112 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 357M | 2,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.58 | 4.81 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 3.95 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.09 | 29.77 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.56 | 8.23 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.23 | 30.87 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement