Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEFIX vs RNWAX
MEFIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts MEFIX vs RNWAX
MEFIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEFIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEFIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. MEFIX (408M). RNWAX pays higher dividends than MEFIX: RNWAX (0.49) vs MEFIX (0.22). MEFIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: MEFIX (11 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MEFIX (1.29). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MEFIX (25.00). MEFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: MEFIX (0) vs RNWAX (250). MEFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.11 vs. RNWAX (14.32). MEFIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.36 vs. RNWAX (8.13).
| MEFIX | RNWAX | MEFIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.66 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.66 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.914 | 10.342 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 408M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.49 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.11 | 14.32 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.77 | 36.49 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.36 | 8.13 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.46 | 93.91 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement