Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEQAX vs TRIGX
MEQAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts MEQAX vs TRIGX
MEQAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEQAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEQAX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. MEQAX (1.34B). MEQAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: MEQAX (2.83) vs TRIGX (2.38). MEQAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: MEQAX (29 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). MEQAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). MEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). MEQAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.94 vs. MEQAX (22.51). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.87 vs. MEQAX (71.29).
| MEQAX | TRIGX | MEQAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.81 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.81 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.699 | 12.363 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 16.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.38 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.51 | 24.94 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.61 | 80.37 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.29 | 93.87 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.33 | 154.05 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement