METV
Price
$19.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
218.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$118.07
Change
+$0.36 (+0.31%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
169.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

METV vs VGT

METV vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • The Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) offers targeted exposure to metaverse-related companies across technology, communication services, and other sectors, while the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) provides broad exposure to the U.S. information technology sector.
  • METV is a thematic, passively managed fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index with approximately 40-44 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.59%, compared to VGT’s broad passive strategy tracking the MSCI US IMI 25/50 Information Technology Index with over 300 holdings and a low expense ratio of 0.09%.
  • Structural differences include METV’s focus on companies deriving revenue from metaverse activities with quarterly rebalancing and concentration in top holdings, versus VGT’s market-cap weighted approach emphasizing large-cap technology leaders with full replication where possible.
  • VGT delivers lower costs and greater diversification within the technology sector, while METV provides higher-risk thematic exposure that may exhibit greater volatility tied to emerging technology adoption cycles.
  • Both ETFs operate in the broader technology space but differ in strategy: METV targets a specific metaverse theme, whereas VGT covers established information technology subsectors including software, hardware, and services.
  • Investors seeking cost-efficient, diversified technology exposure may prefer VGT’s profile, while those pursuing metaverse growth opportunities may consider METV despite its higher fees and narrower focus.

Introduction

The Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) both provide equity exposure within the technology space but pursue distinct objectives. METV targets the emerging metaverse theme through a specialized index, while VGT delivers comprehensive coverage of the established U.S. information technology sector. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative strategies for investors seeking technology-related growth. METV emphasizes innovation in virtual and augmented realities, whereas VGT focuses on proven leaders in software, hardware, and IT services. Comparing them helps investors align exposure with specific thematic or sector preferences in the current market environment.

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) Overview

The Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is a passively managed, thematic exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index. This index selects globally listed companies with significant revenue exposure to metaverse-related activities, including virtual worlds, digital assets, and enabling technologies. The fund typically holds 40-44 securities and employs a modified market-cap weighting scheme with caps to promote diversification. Top holdings often include companies such as Roblox Corp and Apple Inc., with the top 10 representing over 50% of assets. Sector allocations concentrate in communication services and technology. METV carries an expense ratio of 0.59% and rebalances quarterly. Its thematic structure distinguishes it as a targeted vehicle for metaverse adoption rather than broad sector exposure.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI US IMI 25/50 Information Technology Index, which measures the performance of U.S. companies in the information technology sector. VGT uses a full-replication strategy when possible and holds approximately 323 securities, providing broad diversification across software, hardware, semiconductors, and IT services. Top holdings typically feature NVIDIA Corp, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp, and Broadcom Inc., with the largest positions accounting for a significant but diversified portion of assets. The fund maintains a market-cap weighting approach and carries a low expense ratio of 0.09%. Its structure emphasizes cost efficiency and comprehensive sector representation without thematic overlays.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to experience sustained interest driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital transformation. Regulatory developments around data privacy, antitrust scrutiny of large technology firms, and evolving standards for digital assets influence capital flows. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate earnings cycles affect valuations across both broad information technology and emerging metaverse themes. Risks include geopolitical tensions impacting supply chains for semiconductors and potential slowdowns in technology spending during economic uncertainty. These dynamics create an environment where broad sector ETFs and thematic vehicles respond differently to innovation cycles and investor sentiment shifts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has shown sensitivity to developments in virtual and augmented reality adoption, resulting in higher volatility compared to broader benchmarks. Its concentrated thematic exposure can amplify gains during periods of metaverse enthusiasm but may lag during rotations toward established technology leaders. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT), with its diversified holdings in large-cap information technology companies, has demonstrated more stable relative positioning tied to overall sector earnings and capital expenditure trends. Differences in expense ratios and diversification profiles contribute to varying responses to interest rate movements and technology spending patterns, with VGT generally exhibiting lower tracking error to its benchmark due to its scale and replication approach.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors interested in comparing funds like the Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) can leverage this platform for data-driven insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the information technology sector, and established track record of tracking a comprehensive benchmark. The Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) offers unique thematic exposure but carries higher costs and greater concentration risk. Probabilistic assessment points to VGT’s cost efficiency and sector momentum alignment as advantages for most investors seeking technology exposure, though individual preferences for metaverse themes could support METV in targeted allocations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
METV vs. VGT commentary
Jul 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is METV is a Buy and VGT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 169B vs. METV (219M). VGT has a higher annual dividend yield than METV: VGT (25.077) vs METV (2.183). METV was incepted earlier than VGT: METV (5 years) vs VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than METV (0.59). METV has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
METVVGTMETV / VGT
Gain YTD2.18325.0779%
Net Assets219M169B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.09656%
Turnover55.008.00688%
Yield0.180.3651%
Fund Existence5 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METVVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
METV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBOAX25.79N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity A
BPSIX30.32N/A
N/A
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II I
OSPSX12.02N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R6
PGKAX35.69N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Technology A
LCEIX19.57N/A
N/A
Invesco Diversified Dividend Investor

METV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, METV has been loosely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if METV jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To METV
1D Price
Change %
METV100%
N/A
AMAT - METV
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
TXN - METV
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
AVGO - METV
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
MRVL - METV
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
TSM - METV
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More