Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFAAX vs RGVBX
MFAAX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts MFAAX vs RGVBX
MFAAX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFAAX vs. RGVBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFAAX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. MFAAX (12.9B). MFAAX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: MFAAX (4.11) vs RGVBX (3.31). MFAAX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: MFAAX (16 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MFAAX (0.68). MFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). MFAAX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. RGVBX (-1.42). MFAAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.38 vs. RGVBX (-6.33).
| MFAAX | RGVBX | MFAAX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.475 | -2.157 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 24B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 3.31 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | -1.42 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.51 | 8.73 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.38 | -6.33 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.51 | -2.47 | -263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers