Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFAAX vs RGVBX
MFAAX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts MFAAX vs RGVBX
MFAAX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFAAX vs. RGVBX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFAAX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. MFAAX (13B). MFAAX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: MFAAX (4.16) vs RGVBX (3.36). MFAAX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: MFAAX (16 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MFAAX (0.68). MFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). MFAAX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.24 vs. RGVBX (0.64). MFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.16 vs. RGVBX (-5.73).
| MFAAX | RGVBX | MFAAX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.984 | -1.701 | 58% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 23.7B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 3.36 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.24 | 0.64 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.61 | 9.71 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.16 | -5.73 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.21 | -2.18 | -331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement