Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFACX vs RGVAX
MFACX vs RGVAX Comparison
Open Charts MFACX vs RGVAX
MFACX vs RGVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFACX vs. RGVAX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFACX is a Hold and RGVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MFACX (13.1B). MFACX (3.39) and RGVAX (3.31) have matching dividends . MFACX was incepted earlier than RGVAX: MFACX (16 years) vs RGVAX (24 years). MFACX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RGVAX (1.33). MFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). MFACX (250) and RGVAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. RGVAX (2.45). MFACX return over 5 years is better than : -2.95 vs. RGVAX (-4.94).
| MFACX | RGVAX | MFACX / RGVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.33 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.33 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.897 | -1.124 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 3.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 2.45 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.58 | 7.58 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.95 | -4.94 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.41 | -1.91 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers