Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFACX vs RGVCX
MFACX vs RGVCX Comparison
Open Charts MFACX vs RGVCX
MFACX vs RGVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFACX vs. RGVCX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFACX is a Hold and RGVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. MFACX (13B). RGVCX pays higher dividends than MFACX: RGVCX (3.81) vs MFACX (3.39). MFACX was incepted earlier than RGVCX: MFACX (16 years) vs RGVCX (24 years). MFACX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RGVCX (0.89). MFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). MFACX (250) and RGVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.69 vs. RGVCX (1.35). MFACX (-3.48) and RGVCX (-3.62) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFACX | RGVCX | MFACX / RGVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.89 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.89 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.336 | -1.260 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 23.7B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 3.81 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.69 | 1.35 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.07 | 11.24 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.48 | -3.62 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.58 | 2.34 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers