Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFACX vs RGVCX
MFACX vs RGVCX Comparison
Open Charts MFACX vs RGVCX
MFACX vs RGVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFACX vs. RGVCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFACX is a Hold and RGVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. MFACX (12.9B). RGVCX pays higher dividends than MFACX: RGVCX (3.75) vs MFACX (3.34). MFACX was incepted earlier than RGVCX: MFACX (16 years) vs RGVCX (24 years). MFACX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RGVCX (0.89). MFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). MFACX (250) and RGVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.89 vs. RGVCX (-0.97). MFACX (-4.15) and RGVCX (-4.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFACX | RGVCX | MFACX / RGVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.89 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.89 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.013 | -1.847 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 24B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 3.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.89 | -0.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.86 | 10.16 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.15 | -4.25 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.45 | 1.86 | -78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers