Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFACX vs RGVGX
MFACX vs RGVGX Comparison
Open Charts MFACX vs RGVGX
MFACX vs RGVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFACX vs. RGVGX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFACX is a Hold and RGVGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. MFACX (13B). RGVGX pays higher dividends than MFACX: RGVGX (4.48) vs MFACX (3.39). MFACX was incepted earlier than RGVGX: MFACX (16 years) vs RGVGX (17 years). MFACX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RGVGX (0.25). MFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVGX (50.00). MFACX (250) and RGVGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGVGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.01 vs. MFACX (1.69). RGVGX return over 5 years is better than : -0.47 vs. MFACX (-3.48).
| MFACX | RGVGX | MFACX / RGVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.25 | 572% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.25 | 572% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.336 | -0.966 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 23.7B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 4.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.69 | 2.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.07 | 13.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.48 | -0.47 | 748% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.58 | 9.25 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement