Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$25.36
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.31M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.49B
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSIX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. MFADX (89.3M). MFADX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFADX (0.86) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFADX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFADX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. NLSIX (8.71). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 42.50 vs. NLSIX (24.74).
| MFADX | NLSIX | MFADX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.32 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.32 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.312 | 6.080 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.3M | 7.49B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.02 | 4,145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 8.71 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.36 | 18.74 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.50 | 24.74 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.00 | 58.82 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement