Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$23.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.71M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. MFADX (87.7M). MFADX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFADX (0.92) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFADX (13 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFADX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFADX (8.63) and NLSIX (8.52) have marching annual gain over last year. MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. NLSIX (29.63).
| MFADX | NLSIX | MFADX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.32 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.32 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.384 | 3.573 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.7M | 7.39B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.02 | 4,321% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 8.52 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.28 | 16.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 29.63 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.13 | 50.23 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement