Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.2B vs. MFADX (91M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: NLSIX (0.05) vs MFADX (0.02). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFADX (14 years) vs NLSIX (15 years). MFADX (2.26) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.27). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. NLSIX (0.96). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFADX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.84 vs. NLSIX (3.36). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 40.95 vs. NLSIX (16.85).
| MFADX | NLSIX | MFADX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.27 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.27 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.928 | 2.638 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91M | 7.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.05 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.84 | 3.36 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.97 | 21.60 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.95 | 16.85 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.74 | 65.38 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement