Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFAEX vs RGVBX
MFAEX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts MFAEX vs RGVBX
MFAEX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFAEX vs. RGVBX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFAEX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MFAEX (13.1B). MFAEX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: MFAEX (4.18) vs RGVBX (3.31). MFAEX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: MFAEX (16 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MFAEX (0.62). MFAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). MFAEX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.22 vs. RGVBX (2.44). MFAEX return over 5 years is better than : 1.05 vs. RGVBX (-5.03).
| MFAEX | RGVBX | MFAEX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.32 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.32 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.488 | -1.131 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.18 | 3.31 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 2.44 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.28 | 7.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.05 | -5.03 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.90 | -1.93 | -410% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers