Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFAFX vs RGVBX
MFAFX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts MFAFX vs RGVBX
MFAFX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFAFX vs. RGVBX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFAFX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MFAFX (13.1B). MFAFX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: MFAFX (4.44) vs RGVBX (3.31). MFAFX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: MFAFX (16 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MFAFX (0.37). MFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). MFAFX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.38 vs. RGVBX (2.44). MFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.25 vs. RGVBX (-5.03).
| MFAFX | RGVBX | MFAFX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.32 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.32 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.359 | -1.131 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 3.31 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 2.44 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.01 | 7.50 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.25 | -5.03 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.81 | -1.93 | -561% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers