Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFAFX vs RGVCX
MFAFX vs RGVCX Comparison
Open Charts MFAFX vs RGVCX
MFAFX vs RGVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFAFX vs. RGVCX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFAFX is a Hold and RGVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MFAFX (13.1B). MFAFX pays higher dividends than RGVCX: MFAFX (4.44) vs RGVCX (3.75). MFAFX was incepted earlier than RGVCX: MFAFX (16 years) vs RGVCX (24 years). RGVCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MFAFX (0.37). MFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). MFAFX (250) and RGVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.38 vs. RGVCX (2.81). MFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.25 vs. RGVCX (-2.95).
| MFAFX | RGVCX | MFAFX / RGVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.89 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.89 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.359 | -0.899 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 3.75 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 2.81 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.01 | 8.92 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.25 | -2.95 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.81 | 2.41 | 449% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers