Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFAFX vs RGVGX
MFAFX vs RGVGX Comparison
Open Charts MFAFX vs RGVGX
MFAFX vs RGVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFAFX vs. RGVGX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFAFX is a Hold and RGVGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVGX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MFAFX (13.1B). MFAFX (4.48) and RGVGX (4.40) have matching dividends . MFAFX was incepted earlier than RGVGX: MFAFX (16 years) vs RGVGX (17 years). MFAFX (0.37) is less costly to investors than RGVGX (0.25). MFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVGX (50.00). MFAFX (250) and RGVGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.14 vs. RGVGX (4.35). MFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.97 vs. RGVGX (1.48).
| MFAFX | RGVGX | MFAFX / RGVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.25 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.25 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.013 | -0.190 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.48 | 4.40 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 4.35 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.20 | 11.17 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.97 | 1.48 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.42 | 10.03 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers