Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFALX vs MSNCX
MFALX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MFALX vs MSNCX
MFALX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFALX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFALX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. MFALX (72.3M). MSNCX (3.29) and MFALX (3.22) have matching dividends . MFALX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MFALX (36 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MFALX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). MFALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MFALX (4%) and MSNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MFALX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFALX (7.55) and MSNCX (7.54) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. MFALX (2.43).
| MFALX | MSNCX | MFALX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.84 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.86 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.528 | 2.595 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.3M | 578M | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 3.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | 7.54 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.19 | 12.01 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.43 | 3.55 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.88 | 14.93 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers