It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePRU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +8.44% price change this week, while PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.52%.
MFC is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
PRU is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
MFC | PRU | MFC / PRU | |
Capitalization | 44.6B | 42.2B | 106% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 47.149 | 25.190 | 187% |
P/E Ratio | 12.74 | 17.25 | 74% |
Revenue | 42.3B | 54.3B | 78% |
Total Cash | 20.3B | 341B | 6% |
Total Debt | 12.7B | 20.9B | 61% |
MFC | PRU | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 29 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRU's Valuation (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFC (33) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.
PRU's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFC (30) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.
PRU's SMR Rating (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFC (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.
PRU's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFC (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.
MFC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRU (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew significantly faster than PRU’s over the last 12 months.
MFC | PRU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago54% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago54% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago60% | 6 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRU has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRU jumps, then MET could also see price increases.