Ad is loading...
MFCAX vs NAESX
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCAX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.10
Change-$7.24 (-6.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCAX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MFCAX (517M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCAX: NAESX (1.39) vs MFCAX (0.25). MFCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCAX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). MFCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCAX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. MFCAX (-5.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 115.68 vs. MFCAX (59.22).
| MFCAX | NAESX | MFCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.153 | -5.833 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.39 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.18 | 1.18 | -441% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.65 | 6.44 | -274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.22 | 115.68 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.01 | 90.61 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...