Ad is loading...
MFCAX vs NAESX
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCAX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. MFCAX (479M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCAX: NAESX (1.39) vs MFCAX (0.25). MFCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCAX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). MFCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCAX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. MFCAX (-6.00). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. MFCAX (24.56).
| MFCAX | NAESX | MFCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.088 | -12.247 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.39 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -2.36 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.38 | 4.67 | -394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | 71.57 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.32 | 78.60 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers