Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCAX vs VIMSX
MFCAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts MFCAX vs VIMSX
MFCAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCAX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. MFCAX (596M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than MFCAX: VIMSX (1.25) vs MFCAX (0.09). MFCAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: MFCAX (13 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). MFCAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). MFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). MFCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: MFCAX (2500) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX (17.88) and MFCAX (17.21) have marching annual gain over last year. VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 40.15 vs. MFCAX (-5.93).
| MFCAX | VIMSX | MFCAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.17 | 865% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.17 | 865% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.789 | 10.479 | 160% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 596M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.25 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.21 | 17.88 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.45 | 47.61 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.93 | 40.15 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.10 | 164.00 | 25% |