Ad is loading...
MFCCX vs NAESX
MFCCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCCX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
MFCCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCCX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. MFCCX (479M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCCX: NAESX (1.39) vs MFCCX (0.00). MFCCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCCX (10 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). MFCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. MFCCX (-7.01). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. MFCCX (17.81).
| MFCCX | NAESX | MFCCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.17 | 1,324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.17 | 1,324% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.339 | -12.247 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.01 | -2.36 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.17 | 4.67 | -454% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.81 | 71.57 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers