Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCMX vs OWCAX
MFCMX vs OWCAX Comparison
Open Charts MFCMX vs OWCAX
MFCMX vs OWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCMX vs. OWCAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCMX is a Hold and OWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. OWCAX (392M). MFCMX pays higher dividends than OWCAX: MFCMX (2.79) vs OWCAX (2.59). MFCMX was incepted earlier than OWCAX: MFCMX (20 years) vs OWCAX (8 years). MFCMX (1.48) is less costly to investors than OWCAX (0.76). MFCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. OWCAX (24.00). MFCMX (1000) and OWCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. OWCAX (1.13). OWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.71 vs. MFCMX (-0.93).
| MFCMX | OWCAX | MFCMX / OWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.57 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.76 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.375 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 392M | 623% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.59 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 1.13 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.11 | 7.62 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.93 | 1.71 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement