Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCMX vs PBCAX
MFCMX vs PBCAX Comparison
Open Charts MFCMX vs PBCAX
MFCMX vs PBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCMX vs. PBCAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCMX is a Hold and PBCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. PBCAX (394M). PBCAX pays higher dividends than MFCMX: PBCAX (2.90) vs MFCMX (2.70). MFCMX was incepted earlier than PBCAX: MFCMX (20 years) vs PBCAX (36 years). MFCMX (1.48) is less costly to investors than PBCAX (0.75). MFCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PBCAX (43.00). MFCMX (1000) and PBCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PBCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. MFCMX (5.30). PBCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.59 vs. MFCMX (1.02).
| MFCMX | PBCAX | MFCMX / PBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.68 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.620 | 1.005 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 394M | 627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.90 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 5.70 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.86 | 11.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.02 | 2.59 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.39 | 11.83 | 96% |