Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCMX vs PBCAX
MFCMX vs PBCAX Comparison
Open Charts MFCMX vs PBCAX
MFCMX vs PBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCMX vs. PBCAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCMX is a Hold and PBCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.4B vs. PBCAX (390M). PBCAX (2.93) and MFCMX (2.79) have matching dividends . MFCMX was incepted earlier than PBCAX: MFCMX (20 years) vs PBCAX (36 years). MFCMX (1.48) is less costly to investors than PBCAX (0.75). MFCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. PBCAX (43.00). MFCMX (1000) and PBCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PBCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.27 vs. MFCMX (-1.50). PBCAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.55 vs. MFCMX (-2.54).
| MFCMX | PBCAX | MFCMX / PBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.68 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.914 | -1.624 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 390M | 616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.50 | -0.27 | 565% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.53 | 8.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.54 | -0.55 | 460% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.59 | 8.91 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement