Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFECX vs RGACX
MFECX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MFECX vs RGACX
MFECX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFECX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFECX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MFECX (40.1B). MFECX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MFECX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MFECX (30 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MFECX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MFECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFECX: RGACX (250) vs MFECX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. MFECX (-13.71). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.76 vs. MFECX (-11.40).
| MFECX | RGACX | MFECX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.93 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.93 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.795 | 6.443 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 361B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.71 | 7.86 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.88 | 42.49 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.40 | 15.76 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.64 | 103.85 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers