Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFEHX vs RGACX
MFEHX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MFEHX vs RGACX
MFEHX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFEHX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFEHX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MFEHX (40B). MFEHX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MFEHX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MFEHX (21 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MFEHX (0.87). MFEHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MFEHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MFEHX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. MFEHX (-5.63). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.55 vs. MFEHX (8.34).
| MFEHX | RGACX | MFEHX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.93 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.93 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.859 | 3.499 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40B | 361B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.63 | 4.92 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.27 | 41.64 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.34 | 12.55 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.76 | 96.61 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement