Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFEKX vs RGACX
MFEKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MFEKX vs RGACX
MFEKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFEKX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFEKX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MFEKX (38.1B). MFEKX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MFEKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MFEKX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MFEKX (0.53). MFEKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MFEKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MFEKX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. MFEKX (-8.99). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. MFEKX (4.56).
| MFEKX | RGACX | MFEKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.93 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.734 | 8.819 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1B | 353B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.99 | -0.53 | 1,693% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.00 | 40.68 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.56 | 10.82 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.55 | 101.31 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers