Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFEKX vs RGAHX
MFEKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MFEKX vs RGAHX
MFEKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFEKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFEKX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MFEKX (38.1B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MFEKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs MFEKX (0.00). MFEKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MFEKX (15 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MFEKX (0.53) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MFEKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). MFEKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: MFEKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. MFEKX (-8.99). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. MFEKX (4.56).
| MFEKX | RGAHX | MFEKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.44 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.44 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.734 | 9.200 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1B | 353B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.99 | 0.18 | -5,007% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.00 | 43.47 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.56 | 13.78 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.55 | 106.68 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement