Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFELX vs RGACX
MFELX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MFELX vs RGACX
MFELX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFELX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFELX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MFELX (38.1B). MFELX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MFELX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MFELX (21 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MFELX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MFELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MFELX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MFELX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. MFELX (-17.96). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. MFELX (-19.51).
| MFELX | RGACX | MFELX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.93 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.93 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 8.819 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1B | 353B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.96 | -0.53 | 3,381% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.46 | 40.68 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.51 | 10.82 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.03 | 101.31 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers