MFG
Price
$5.50
Change
+$0.04 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
49.2B
21 days until earnings call
UMBF
Price
$111.03
Change
+$0.35 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jul 10, 12:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.12B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs UMBF

Header iconMFG vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs UMBFBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$5.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.73%)
Volume$2.8M
Capitalization49.2B
UMB Financial
Price$111.03
Change+$0.35 (+0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.12B
MFG vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. UMBF commentary
Jul 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a StrongBuy and UMBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $5.50 vs. UMBF: $110.69)
Brand notoriety: MFG and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 94% vs. UMBF: 126%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $49.2B vs. UMBF: $4.12B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $49.2B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and UMBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and UMBF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than UMBF($4.12B). UMBF (11.78) and MFG (11.31) have similar P/E ratio . MFG YTD gains are higher at: 12.474 vs. UMBF (-1.167). UMBF has less debt than MFG: UMBF (1.38B) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than UMBF: MFG (2.88T) vs UMBF (1.33B).
MFGUMBFMFG / UMBF
Capitalization49.2B4.12B1,194%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.474-1.167-1,069%
P/E Ratio11.3111.7896%
Revenue2.88T1.33B217,195%
Total CashN/A447M-
Total Debt20.53T1.38B1,484,671%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2036
SMR RATING
1..100
110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6927
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (50) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (69) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WDSCX17.66N/A
N/A
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
FNCRX30.57N/A
N/A
Franklin Natural Resources C
MSALX25.59N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Intl Advtg L
RPTIX101.95N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
SBHSX13.42N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.73%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
HBAN - MFG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
RF - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
DB - MFG
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
More