DB
Price
$35.30
Change
-$0.78 (-2.16%)
Updated
Jun 23, 02:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
68.3B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$9.77
Change
-$0.38 (-3.74%)
Updated
Jun 23, 02:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
121.47B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DB vs MFG

DB vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Deutsche Bank (DB) vs. Mizuho Financial Group (MFG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • DB shares trade around $32 with a trailing P/E of 8.6 and dividend yield near 3.7%, reflecting strong Q1 2026 earnings and RoTE (return on tangible equity) of 12.7%.
  • MFG trades near $8.50 with a P/E of 15-16 and yield around 2.3%, supported by robust 1-year gains of over 70% amid Japanese banking momentum.
  • Recent market activity shows DB up YTD by about 17% versus European benchmarks, while MFG trails its Nikkei benchmark slightly but outperforms over longer periods.
  • Both face sector risks like interest rate shifts and credit losses, but DB's CET1 ratio (Common Equity Tier 1 capital, a key measure of bank capital strength) at 13.8% signals resilience.
  • MFG benefits from Japan's economic shifts, including higher NII (net interest income), while DB shows diversified revenue growth.
  • Relative performance highlights MFG's superior 1-year momentum, contrasting DB's value-oriented positioning.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines DB (Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft), a leading European investment bank, and MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.), one of Japan's megabanks. Both operate in the global banking sector, offering exposure to corporate lending, investment banking, and asset management amid shifting interest rates and economic recovery. Traders seeking momentum may eye MFG's strong yearly gains, while value investors could favor DB's attractive multiples. This analysis highlights recent performance, financial health, and market positioning to inform relative performance decisions in today's volatile environment.

DB Overview and Recent Performance

Deutsche Bank, headquartered in Frankfurt, provides corporate banking, investment banking, private banking, and asset management services worldwide. In recent market activity, DB shares have fluctuated around $32, reflecting a year-to-date gain of approximately 17%, outperforming the DAX benchmark. The stock experienced short-term pressure with a 2% monthly dip but remains within a 52-week range of $27-$40. Q1 2026 results drove positive sentiment, with profit before tax up 7% year-over-year to €3 billion, revenues at €8.7 billion (up 2% or 6% FX-adjusted), and post-tax RoTE improving to 12.7% from 11.9%. Cost/income ratio fell to 58.9%, aided by higher NII and fee income. Influences include accelerated corporate lending, €22 billion in net asset inflows (AuM at €1.8 trillion), and a solid CET1 ratio of 13.8% within the 13.5-14% target, supporting a €1 billion share buyback. Regulatory scrutiny and European rate dynamics have tempered gains, yet diversified earnings mix bolsters stability.

MFG Overview and Recent Performance

Mizuho Financial Group, based in Tokyo, engages in retail/business banking, corporate/investment banking, global markets, and asset management, with a focus on Japanese corporates and international expansion. MFG shares hover near $8.50, posting year-to-date returns around 16-18% but slightly trailing the Nikkei 225, amid a 52-week range of $5-$10. Recent weeks saw modest 0.5% monthly gains after quarterly pullbacks, driven by strong longer-term momentum with 70%+ 1-year returns. Q3 FY2026 earnings beat estimates with EPS of $0.16 (versus $0.14 expected), though revenue missed; full-year revenue grew significantly, supported by Japan's end to deflation and rising NII. Profit margins stand at 26%, ROE (return on equity) near 9.7%, with AuM expansion via corporate focus. Sentiment reflects optimism on domestic loan market share (6.8%) and global M&A advisory, tempered by yen volatility and upcoming Q4 results. Overseas growth in financing for multinationals aids resilience amid regional rate hikes.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from 351 total bots, curated by AI analysis for superior performance in current market conditions. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, price action, and trend analysis, with timeframes from 1 day to 46 days. Top performers boast annualized returns up to +285% (e.g., Space Infrastructure), win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, focusing on high-growth areas like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and finance. While hundreds of AI Trading Bots are available for various styles and risk levels, only these trending ones—engineered to outperform—earn a spot based on real-time signals and backtested results. Explore them for copy trading insights tailored to volatility.

Head-to-Head Comparison

DB and MFG share banking models blending lending, investment services, and asset management but differ in geography: DB emphasizes European corporates and global IB (investment banking), while MFG prioritizes Japanese firms with growing international exposure. Growth drivers contrast: DB via NII expansion (€14 billion FY guidance) and inflows; MFG through domestic recovery and yen effects. Recent momentum favors MFG (70%+ 1-year vs. DB's 20%), but DB offers cheaper valuation (P/E 8.6 vs. 15+, higher yield 3.7% vs. 2.3%). Risks include credit losses (NCO, net charge-offs) for both, with DB exposed to Eurozone slowdowns and MFG to Japan policy shifts. Sector exposure tilts DB toward IB volatility, MFG to retail stability; sentiment leans positive for both post-earnings, with DB's buybacks signaling confidence.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors DB for its trend consistency in recent quarters, higher RoTE (12.7%), attractive valuation, and CET1 stability amid European recovery signals. MFG shows stronger multi-year momentum, but near-term catalysts like Q4 earnings and potential rate normalization introduce variability. Observable factors—earnings beats, capital returns, and relative P/E—position DB with higher probability for stable outperformance, though sector volatility warrants monitoring.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
DB vs. MFG commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a Buy and MFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (DB: $36.09 vs. MFG: $10.15)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. MFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 87% vs. MFG: 167%
Market capitalization -- DB: $68.3B vs. MFG: $121.47B
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $68.3B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $121.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DB and MFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the short-term than MFG.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.61% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($121B) has a higher market cap than DB($68.3B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than DB: MFG (16.28) vs DB (9.96). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 38.661 vs. DB (-6.406). DB has less debt than MFG: DB (137B) vs MFG (26.18T). MFG has higher revenues than DB: MFG (4.32T) vs DB (32.2B).
DBMFGDB / MFG
Capitalization68.3B121B56%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.40638.661-17%
P/E Ratio9.9616.2861%
Revenue32.2B4.32T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt137B26.18T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
DB
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3338
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2712
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (22) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (79). This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (27). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (6). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (45). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DB (82). This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLTK3.560.07
+1.86%
Playtika Holding Corp
EPRT29.460.10
+0.34%
Essential Properties Realty Trust
SMFG25.03-0.20
-0.79%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
NTRP2.05-0.02
-0.97%
NextTrip
LTRX6.39-0.25
-3.77%
Lantronix