MFIN
Price
$9.89
Change
+$0.12 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
225.81M
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMF
Price
$60.73
Change
+$0.99 (+1.66%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.9B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFIN vs OMF

MFIN vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFIN vs. OMF commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFIN is a StrongBuy and OMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (MFIN: $9.77 vs. OMF: $59.74)
Brand notoriety: MFIN and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFIN: 22% vs. OMF: 91%
Market capitalization -- MFIN: $225.81M vs. OMF: $6.9B
MFIN [@Savings Banks] is valued at $225.81M. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $676.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $32.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than MFIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFIN is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

MFIN (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.81% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.77% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.9B) has a higher market cap than MFIN($226M). OMF has higher P/E ratio than MFIN: OMF (8.90) vs MFIN (6.60). MFIN YTD gains are higher at: -2.334 vs. OMF (-8.181). MFIN has less debt than OMF: MFIN (265M) vs OMF (22.4B). OMF has higher revenues than MFIN: OMF (5.05B) vs MFIN (236M).
MFINOMFMFIN / OMF
Capitalization226M6.9B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.334-8.18129%
P/E Ratio6.608.9074%
Revenue236M5.05B5%
Total Cash15.8MN/A-
Total Debt265M22.4B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFIN vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
MFIN
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5746
SMR RATING
1..100
5710
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3880
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MFIN (11) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MFIN (57) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFIN (57) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MFIN (52) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

MFIN's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMF (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFINOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFBFX31.120.29
+0.94%
Emerald Bkg & Finac Evolution - Inv
HWSZX91.840.72
+0.79%
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z
HBLYX15.150.05
+0.33%
Hartford Balanced Income Y
TEMFX10.38-0.02
-0.19%
Templeton Foreign A
GGEAX24.94-0.08
-0.32%
Nationwide Schroders Global Eq A

MFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIN has been loosely correlated with RM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFIN jumps, then RM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIN
1D Price
Change %
MFIN100%
+2.20%
RM - MFIN
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
OMF - MFIN
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
ALLY - MFIN
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
CACC - MFIN
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
NAVI - MFIN
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.63%
SYF - OMF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
ALLY - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
R - OMF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
COF - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
URI - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
More