Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSCX vs MSNCX
MFSCX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MFSCX vs MSNCX
MFS SC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.11M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets503.34M
MFSCX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSCX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSCX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 503M vs. MFSCX (216M). MFSCX (3.38) and MSNCX (3.33) have matching dividends . MFSCX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MFSCX (41 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MFSCX (19.00). MFSCX (4%) and MSNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MFSCX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.67 vs. MSNCX (-0.73). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.00 vs. MFSCX (0.48).
| MFSCX | MSNCX | MFSCX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.86 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.036 | -0.046 | 79% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 216M | 503M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 3.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.67 | -0.73 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.57 | 8.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.48 | 2.00 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.17 | 14.27 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement