Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSCX vs MSNCX
MFSCX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MFSCX vs MSNCX
MFS SC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.45M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.11M
MFSCX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSCX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSCX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 466M vs. MFSCX (213M). MFSCX (3.31) and MSNCX (3.27) have matching dividends . MFSCX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MFSCX (41 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MFSCX (0.89) and MSNCX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MFSCX (19.00). MFSCX (4%) and MSNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MFSCX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.25 vs. MFSCX (-2.46). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.11 vs. MFSCX (-2.83).
| MFSCX | MSNCX | MFSCX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.289 | -3.063 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 466M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.27 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.46 | -2.25 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.99 | 1.56 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.83 | -1.11 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.12 | 10.54 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement