Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSCX vs MSNCX
MFSCX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MFSCX vs MSNCX
MFSCX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSCX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSCX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 557M vs. MFSCX (252M). MFSCX (3.57) and MSNCX (3.41) have matching dividends . MFSCX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MFSCX (42 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.92) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MFSCX (4%) and MSNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MFSCX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. MSNCX (4.10). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. MFSCX (-0.44).
| MFSCX | MSNCX | MFSCX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.84 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.86 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.226 | -0.492 | 46% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 557M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 3.41 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 4.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.39 | 10.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 0.15 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.57 | 11.59 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement