Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFWCX vs RIRBX
MFWCX vs RIRBX Comparison
Open Charts MFWCX vs RIRBX
MFWCX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFWCX vs. RIRBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFWCX is a Hold and RIRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. MFWCX (1.22B). MFWCX (2.12) and RIRBX (2.02) have matching dividends . MFWCX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: MFWCX (32 years) vs RIRBX (24 years). MFWCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.35). MFWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RIRBX (50.00). RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFWCX: RIRBX (250) vs MFWCX (1000). RIRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. MFWCX (6.75). RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.11 vs. MFWCX (-3.83).
| MFWCX | RIRBX | MFWCX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.35 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.35 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.623 | 7.077 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 128B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 2.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 11.62 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 38.40 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.83 | 33.11 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.37 | 65.06 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement