Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFWCX vs RIRBX
MFWCX vs RIRBX Comparison
Open Charts MFWCX vs RIRBX
MFWCX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFWCX vs. RIRBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFWCX is a Buy and RIRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. MFWCX (1.23B). RIRBX (1.96) and MFWCX (1.90) have matching dividends . MFWCX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: MFWCX (33 years) vs RIRBX (24 years). MFWCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.35). MFWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RIRBX (50.00). RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFWCX: RIRBX (250) vs MFWCX (1000). RIRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. MFWCX (3.99). RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.62 vs. MFWCX (-2.76).
| MFWCX | RIRBX | MFWCX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.35 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.35 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.632 | 9.054 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 131B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.96 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.99 | 6.78 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.49 | 41.10 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.76 | 34.62 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.18 | 63.19 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement