MGA
Price
$46.77
Change
+$0.61 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.14B
44 days until earnings call
QS
Price
$10.26
Change
+$0.11 (+1.08%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.86B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGA vs QS

Header iconMGA vs QS Comparison
Open Charts MGA vs QSBanner chart's image
Magna International
Price$46.77
Change+$0.61 (+1.32%)
Volume$13.4K
Capitalization13.14B
QuantumScape
Price$10.26
Change+$0.11 (+1.08%)
Volume$148.3K
Capitalization5.86B
MGA vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGA vs. QS commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGA is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (MGA: $46.15 vs. QS: $10.15)
Brand notoriety: MGA and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGA: 86% vs. QS: 95%
Market capitalization -- MGA: $13.14B vs. QS: $5.86B
MGA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $13.14B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $89.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +18.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.13% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($13.1B) has a higher market cap than QS($5.86B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 95.568 vs. MGA (14.647). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.04B vs. QS (-382.46M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. QS (797M). QS has less debt than MGA: QS (89.4M) vs MGA (8.12B). MGA has higher revenues than QS: MGA (41.6B) vs QS (0).
MGAQSMGA / QS
Capitalization13.1B5.86B223%
EBITDA4.04B-382.46M-1,057%
Gain YTD14.64795.56815%
P/E Ratio10.83N/A-
Revenue41.6B0-
Total Cash1.54B797M193%
Total Debt8.12B89.4M9,078%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGA: Fundamental Ratings
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
70
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGAQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPD25.650.07
+0.27%
Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF
ENOR29.400.07
+0.25%
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
HQH16.41-0.05
-0.30%
abrdn Healthcare Investors
NRO3.24-0.02
-0.61%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Sec Income Fund
NVDG17.79-0.59
-3.21%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Nvda Daily ETF