Advertisement
MGA vs VC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Magna International Inc. (MGA) vs. Visteon Corporation (VC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both MGA and VC, key players in the auto parts sector, have posted strong year-to-date (YTD) gains of approximately 17-19% amid recovering automotive demand.
- MGA offers a larger market capitalization of $17.2 billion and a higher dividend yield of 3.18%, attracting income-focused investors.
- VC demonstrates higher trailing earnings per share (EPS) at $5.98 and a lower beta of 1.16, suggesting reduced volatility compared to the market.
- MGA has significantly outperformed over the past year with 88.81% returns versus VC's 44.52%.
- Recent analyst upgrades for MGA and price target increases for VC reflect positive sentiment in recent weeks.
Introduction
Magna International Inc. (MGA) and Visteon Corporation (VC) are prominent auto parts suppliers navigating a cyclical industry influenced by global vehicle production, electric vehicle (EV) transitions, and supply chain dynamics. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing short-term momentum and investors seeking exposure to automotive recovery trends. With both stocks showing resilience in recent market activity, understanding their business models, performance metrics, and sector positioning helps assess relative opportunities in a competitive landscape.
MGA Overview and Recent Performance
Magna International Inc. (MGA) is a diversified automotive supplier operating across body exteriors, power and vision systems, seating, and complete vehicles, serving major original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) worldwide. In recent weeks, MGA's stock has traded around $62, with a market capitalization of $17.2 billion and a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 21.26. The shares have benefited from anticipation surrounding upcoming quarterly earnings, where analysts expect beats based on prior results, alongside a Scotiabank upgrade to Sector Outperform with a $72 target. Strong one-year gains of nearly 89% reflect improved sentiment tied to robust Q4 fiscal 2025 results and exposure to EV battery enclosures and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). However, a beta of 1.83 indicates heightened sensitivity to market swings.
VC Overview and Recent Performance
Visteon Corporation (VC) specializes in automotive electronics, including instrument clusters, infotainment systems, and connected car solutions, positioning it for growth in digital cockpits and battery management. Trading near $113 with a $3 billion market cap and trailing P/E of 18.92, the stock has seen YTD appreciation of 19.44%. Recent market activity features Barclays raising its price target to $115 while maintaining Equal Weight, signaling steady confidence amid modest revenue projections. Performance has been supported by EPS growth estimates of 10% for the current year, though one-year returns lag at 44.52%. A lower beta of 1.16 offers relative stability in the volatile auto sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from more than 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, including signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents, optimized for various timeframes like 60-minute or 5-minute charts and market volatility levels from low to high. Selected for current market conditions based on technical and fundamental analysis, they provide real-time signals for copy trading. Traders can explore performance across growth sectors to align with their risk tolerance and style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MGA and VC operate in the auto parts sector but differ in focus: MGA's broad manufacturing contrasts with VC's electronics emphasis, offering VC potential upside from EV digitalization. Growth drivers include rising vehicle output for both, though MGA benefits from complete vehicle assembly. Recent momentum favors MGA's explosive one-year returns, while VC edges YTD. Risk factors highlight MGA's higher beta versus VC's stability; market sentiment is buoyed by analyst optimism for earnings catalysts in both.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MGA due to its superior trend consistency over the past year, higher dividend yield, and near-term earnings catalysts with positive analyst revisions. While VC offers stability and electronics exposure, MGA's scale and momentum provide a probabilistic edge in the prevailing auto recovery environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGA is a Hold and VC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MGA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MGA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MGA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- VC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.64% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
MGA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
VC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.13% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| MGA | VC | MGA / VC | |
| Capitalization | 18B | 3.2B | 562% |
| EBITDA | 3.38B | 418M | 810% |
| Gain YTD | 25.697 | 27.082 | 95% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.83 | 20.07 | 139% |
| Revenue | 42.3B | 3.79B | 1,117% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 680M | 236% |
| Total Debt | 6.7B | 436M | 1,537% |
MGA | VC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MGA's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (20). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.
VC's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (100). This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.
VC's SMR Rating (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (84). This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.
MGA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (43). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.
MGA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (8). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.
| MGA | VC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOXQ | 115.11 | 2.41 | +2.14% |
| Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | |||
| AIVL | 129.71 | 0.83 | +0.65% |
| WisdomTree US Al Enhanced Val ETF | |||
| SYFI | 35.70 | N/A | N/A |
| AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | |||
| NFEB | 30.29 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| RSEE | 39.73 | -0.07 | -0.19% |
| Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | |||
MGA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGA | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| LEA - MGA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| VC - MGA | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.44% | ||
| CPS - MGA | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| APTV - MGA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| THRM - MGA | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
VC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VC has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VC jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.