Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGEMX vs RNWHX
MGEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MGEMX vs RNWHX
MGEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. MGEMX (175M). MGEMX (1.22) and RNWHX (1.17) have matching dividends . MGEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MGEMX (34 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). MGEMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MGEMX (30.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MGEMX (1000000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.78 vs. MGEMX (-28.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.87 vs. MGEMX (-33.29).
| MGEMX | RNWHX | MGEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.219 | 13.978 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.17 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.15 | 21.78 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.80 | 44.40 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.29 | 17.87 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.42 | 107.97 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers