Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFAX vs NPFCX
MGFAX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGFAX vs NPFCX
MGFAX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFAX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFAX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFAX (132M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: NPFCX (0.33) vs MGFAX (0.00). MGFAX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGFAX (22 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) and MGFAX (1.43) have similar cost to investors . MGFAX (24.00) and NPFCX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: NPFCX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.16 vs. MGFAX (-25.71). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.21 vs. MGFAX (-61.29).
| MGFAX | NPFCX | MGFAX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.47 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.47 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.102 | 2.656 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.71 | 2.16 | -1,188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.16 | 27.59 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -61.29 | 5.21 | -1,177% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.73 | 90.85 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers